Collective Madness vs Common Sense

A Look Back at Four Rather "Special" Years

The Price of Silence: The Repercussions of Blind Trust

Today, it seems essential never to forget how easily people were swept away by a blinding ideology: "Trust the science," while dismissing common sense and critical thinking at the onset of a supposedly "deadly cosmic virus of unknown origin" that was allegedly poised to decimate humanity.

With the Trump administration preparing to expose the deep state in the United States and hold certain figures accountable, considering a possible link between health issues, the recent surge in excess mortality, and a "gene therapy" previously presented as 100% effective or safe is not far-fetched. People are generally not anti-vaccine, but this does not change the fact that questions need to be asked. The truth is, even traditional vaccines cannot be universally safe and effective, as side effects will always exist. However, pharmaceutical companies who bankrolled massive ad campaigns also ensured their legal immunity against these "non-existent" effects—this alone should have been a red flag.

Over the months, the media perpetuated contradictory messages: one day, masks were essential; the next day, in some cases, they were not. Strict restrictions were imposed on the unvaccinated, all while acknowledging that this product did not prevent transmission. These constant shifts generated an extreme climate of confusion. Simultaneously, emotionally charged and guilt-inducing messages pressured the public to conform without question, making any disagreement socially unacceptable. As governments promoted health passports, anyone capable of minimal, non-emotional reasoning could only question the official narrative. We were told the therapy was 100% effective, that it was impossible to contract or transmit the illness once "protected," yet injected people were still expected to protect themselves from the unvaccinated. I'm no genius, but common sense was enough. From the start of the "pandemic," the media narrative was marked by incessant contradictions, making it hard for the public to assess rationally.

Then we were assured the shots were 100% effective, that they prevented transmission, yet soon after, people were advised to protect themselves from the unvaccinated, even if they were vaccinated themselves. This double-talk immediately sowed doubt, but any questioning was instantly suppressed by the media and social networks, and anyone daring to ask legitimate questions was quickly labeled as a far-right conspiracy theorist or even a Nazi accused of endangering others.

It was claimed that the unvaccinated were the source of variants—a "scientific" perspective. Yet experienced virologists had warned against a massive, collective rollout of non-sterilizing injections in the midst of a "pandemic." They argued that an inability to halt transmission would only foster the appearance of variants, and this is precisely what happened. However, these scientific perspectives were sidelined and branded as "disinformation," while the dissenting scientists themselves were vilified. These experts, censored and ostracized, were not given the chance to open a public debate or share their concerns in mainstream media, as mediocre media personalities spread their message of fear and division, slandering prominent professors.

Politicians fueled division by confidently attributing variants to the unvaccinated, further stoking fear and polarization, pitting us against one another, habituating us to QR codes, all while some enjoyed massive profits as the economy and quality of life for the majority plummeted. This media campaign, combined with intense social pressure, directly benefited Big Pharma and certain billionaires like Bill Gates, a master of legal bribery with a dubious past, across industries. This shaming and blaming strategy served as an extremely effective psychological operation. By concealing potential side effects and securing legal protection from liability, pharmaceutical companies could impose their products without fear of lawsuits while amassing record profits. Each change in official discourse, every new obligation, and every coercive measure only served to fill the coffers of this industry, under the guise of "public health."

I would never have taken an interest in vaccines if it weren’t for the arrival of this "gene therapy" and the circus we were all forced to endure. Watching friends fall for it left me bewildered. So I began researching and uncovered the vast gap between the supposed "scientific consensus" and reality. These companies, repeatedly convicted in the past for manipulating clinical trials and scientific institutions, had been fined millions of dollars for fraud, yet the media and political class continued to present their claims as undeniable truths.

The Tyranny of Fear: How Censorship Replaced Dialogue

When an argument is strong, censorship is unnecessary. In an actual crisis, like the bubonic plague, where bodies filled the streets, there was no need for manipulation or coercion. Silencing respected scientists was an obvious sign that something was wrong. This was further confirmed in 2024, during testimonies before the U.S. Congress by social media executives, who revealed that Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube systematically censored any opposition and stifled debate on the injection. This censorship and refusal to engage in open dialogue was a direct assault on fundamental rights, regardless of one’s opinion on the matter.

People felt compelled to comply to travel, work, or study. Very few had the courage to say no, fearing they couldn’t feed their families or simply be admitted to a hospital for treatment. This tyrannical control divided society in two, with privileges granted to some and increased control over the majority. People lost their jobs, while disdainful politicians dined mask-free in public.

Globalists, working behind the scenes through private NGOs, coordinated an assault on the global economy, decimating small businesses and weakening communities. Under the guise of "public health," they closed local gathering spaces and places of worship while allowing large corporations to remain open and thrive, concentrating wealth and power in the hands of the "elite" and eroding social cohesion.

At first, I agreed—prudence was necessary. But soon, the charade became obvious to me. We were treated like mindless sheep. All it took was not taking the bait of fear and using critical thinking to see through it. Those who had contracted and recovered from COVID, like me, were forced to take an "injection" without any acknowledgment of natural immunity. Refusing this controversial product was treated as heresy by the health inquisition. And all this for a virus with a mortality rate lower than that of the flu. After two years, anyone with a bit of common sense could see that the official narrative no longer held coherence. The lies, the constant changes in media and political messaging, served only to violate people’s rights and justify a health dictatorship.

The most terrible legacy of these three years of madness is undoubtedly the mark left on our children's minds, an invisible but profound burden that will weigh heavily on the future. Deprived of the spontaneity of play, free smiles, and human connection, they grew up under the weight of constant anxiety, absorbing without understanding the message that others are a threat. Their hearts, once full of innocence, are now steeped in fears that no generation should ever have known. What kind of world will emerge from souls marked so young by isolation and distrust?

What Does This Have to Do with Bitcoin and “Freedom Tech”?

The pandemic shed light on a brutal truth: without financial independence and the freedom to conduct transactions without surveillance or punishment, we are not truly free. When authoritarian measures imposed by world governments could control every aspect of our lives—from the right to work to basic access to a restaurant or plane—it revealed just how dependent the population was on the system, with no alternative or escape. Those who opposed or even asked questions were demonized, monitored, censored, and we all lost freedoms. This dark period shows precisely why technologies like Bitcoin and innovations from the "Freedom Tech" movement are essential.

Bitcoin represents much more than a means of exchange; it is a tool for individual sovereignty. It offers a way to store and transfer value without interference from central authorities, allowing everyone to avoid being at the mercy of government and banking control policies.

Flag Theory," diversifying one's resources and affiliations, becomes here an act of survival and resistance. Those who control your money, monitor your transactions, and impose financial sanctions inevitably dictate your behavior. Bitcoin, however, is a beacon of freedom for those who refuse to submit to such control.

The "pandemic" demonstrated just how easily a state can shift from protector to oppressor, exploiting citizens’ economic dependencies. If another authoritarian event were to occur, it would be imperative for everyone to have the means to defend their fundamental rights. The ability to manage and preserve one's capital, shielded from intrusive oversight and sanctions linked to dissent or differing ideas, is just one of the fundamental freedoms Bitcoin can restore. By eliminating the need for centralized third-party trust, Bitcoin gives individuals direct and absolute control over their finances, preventing any arbitrary seizure or blocking by institutions. Its decentralized and censorship-resistant nature allows transactions without permission, free from state surveillance, ensuring privacy in an increasingly intrusive world.

Bitcoin also serves as a store of value that escapes central banks' manipulated inflation, thus protecting your purchasing power over the long term. Furthermore, its global accessibility, regardless of geographical location or banking infrastructure, opens up the possibility for everyone, even the unbanked, to join a global financial system.

Finally, Bitcoin provides a form of economic resistance against confiscation through inflationary currency: by restoring people’s control over their accumulated wealth and time, it fosters independence from the traditional financial system and strengthens individual sovereignty against crises and authority manipulation.

I explore all these topics in my book, and I encourage you to take an interest in them as we approach a bright future for those who are not asleep.